Anthony Chan spent two years creating the first five monkeys in the world to be genetically engineered with human mutations — in this case, for Huntington’s disease. But three of the five monkeys, reported in 2008, developed severe symptoms of Huntington’s much more quickly than anticipated, and had to be killed within a month of birth. Viruses used to introduce the relevant gene had inserted extra copies randomly, intensifying the symptoms — and highlighting the method’s limitations in creating animal disease models.
Chan, a geneticist at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, and other scientists around the world are now eyeing precision genome-editing techniques that solve such problems by using enzymes and RNA instead of viruses. Many have high hopes that transgenic monkeys will mimic human genetic conditions more faithfully than mice — and thus permit better drug-development tests. Many also say that the primates will accelerate basic research in neuroscience, permitting researchers to map and test complex neural circuits underlying behaviors that do not exist in simpler organisms. “We weren’t even able to think about this before,” says Chan.
Work is already under way in a few labs. Erika Sasaki, a geneticist at Keio University in Tokyo, was part of the team that used viruses to produce the first transgenic marmoset to pass on an engineered gene to its offspring. On 11 November, at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in San Diego, California, Sasaki and her colleagues will present efforts to model autistic behavior in marmosets using mutations produced with zinc-finger nucleases — a class of DNA-cutting enzyme. Next month, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, is hosting a workshop to bring together molecular biologists, bioengineers and neuroscientists to work on challenges in the field. “This is something with tremendous potential,” says Terrence Sejnowski, head of the computational neurobiology laboratory at the Salk Institute.
Neuroscientists have long wanted transgenic monkeys. Disorders such as autism, schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease cannot be fully replicated in mice, which lack the complex cognitive and social abilities of primates. Moreover, many neuroactive drugs that showed early promise in mice have failed in human trials.
But researchers have persisted in working with mice, mainly because there is a targeted gene-editing strategy that works in the animals. It relies on extremely rare, spontaneous DNA-swapping events to alter or disable certain genes. The method requires several arduous steps: designing the desired mutation and introducing it to embryonic stem cells; detecting it in the tiny fraction of stem cells that incorporate it; integrating those stem cells into a developing mouse embryo; and then hoping that when the ‘patchwork’ animal matures, its sperm or eggs will carry the mutation, allowing the creation of transgenic offspring.
Source: Feng Zhang/MIT
The approach is feasible only because mouse stem cells are relatively cheap to maintain and screen, and because mice reach sexual maturity within weeks and produce large litters. “You don’t have that luxury with monkeys,” says Edward Callaway, a neuroscientist at the Salk Institute. Marmosets, for example, take 15 months to mature sexually, carry babies for 5 months and often give birth to only 2 young. Macaques take even longer — 3 years to reach sexual maturity, and they typically produce a single baby after a 5.5-month gestation. But custom monkeys have become a possibility thanks to efficient gene-editing techniques that can support a method in which embryos are manipulated one at a time. In one method, zinc-finger nucleases home in on specific genomic regions, and cut genes open to disrupt their function or allow researchers to substitute in external DNA. In another, called CRISPR, a customizable RNA fragment is used to guide a DNA-cutting enzyme to the right spot (see ‘CRISPR cuts’). Feng Zhang, a synthetic biologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, showed in May that CRISPR could be used to make precise mutations in multiple genes in mouse embryos. That, he says, could pave the way for monkey models of human brain disorders that involve more than one gene.
“We now have, for the first time, the possibility of trying some of the treatments for genetic-based diseases in primates,” says Robert Desimone, director of the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT.
MIT researchers are now testing CRISPR on fertilized monkey eggs, in collaboration with researchers from the Oregon National Primate Research Center in Beaverton. They will start by disabling genes. MIT neuroscientist Guoping Feng, one of Zhang’s collaborators, wants to disrupt a gene called SHANK3, which has been implicated in some human cases of autism. More sophisticated changes, such as swapping in a different version of a gene, will require more work and engineering, says Zhang.
Eventually, he adds, CRISPR might be used to label specific monkey neuron types or control them with light — just as is currently possible with mouse neurons. Basic neuroscientists are especially keen to see those applications succeed. Anthony Movshon, a monkey-vision researcher at New York University, has watched over the past decade as scientists have used genetic tools to stimulate, inhibit and record neural activity in mice and flies. But for many important areas of neuroscience — cognition, attention, memory and decision-making — those animals are “not that interesting”, he says.
All of this excitement comes at a time when monkey research has become increasingly difficult. In January, following years of pressure by animal-rights activists, United Airlines announced that it would stop transporting research monkeys — eliminating the last North American air carrier available to primate researchers (see Nature 483, 381–382; 2012). And in April, the New England Primate Research Center in Southborough, Massachusetts — one of eight such centers supported by the US National Institutes of Health — announced that it would close after gradually transferring its animals to other facilities.
Despite the controversies, some researchers say that using transgenic monkeys may be the best way to search for treatments for brain diseases and to investigate how networks of neurons create consciousness. “You want to match the model system to the question you’re asking,” says Movshon. “It’s just as unethical to use a mouse for an experiment for which it’s not suited.”
This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on November 6, 2013.
Chan, a geneticist at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, and other scientists around the world are now eyeing precision genome-editing techniques that solve such problems by using enzymes and RNA instead of viruses. Many have high hopes that transgenic monkeys will mimic human genetic conditions more faithfully than mice — and thus permit better drug-development tests. Many also say that the primates will accelerate basic research in neuroscience, permitting researchers to map and test complex neural circuits underlying behaviors that do not exist in simpler organisms. “We weren’t even able to think about this before,” says Chan.
Work is already under way in a few labs. Erika Sasaki, a geneticist at Keio University in Tokyo, was part of the team that used viruses to produce the first transgenic marmoset to pass on an engineered gene to its offspring. On 11 November, at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in San Diego, California, Sasaki and her colleagues will present efforts to model autistic behavior in marmosets using mutations produced with zinc-finger nucleases — a class of DNA-cutting enzyme. Next month, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, is hosting a workshop to bring together molecular biologists, bioengineers and neuroscientists to work on challenges in the field. “This is something with tremendous potential,” says Terrence Sejnowski, head of the computational neurobiology laboratory at the Salk Institute.
Neuroscientists have long wanted transgenic monkeys. Disorders such as autism, schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease cannot be fully replicated in mice, which lack the complex cognitive and social abilities of primates. Moreover, many neuroactive drugs that showed early promise in mice have failed in human trials.
But researchers have persisted in working with mice, mainly because there is a targeted gene-editing strategy that works in the animals. It relies on extremely rare, spontaneous DNA-swapping events to alter or disable certain genes. The method requires several arduous steps: designing the desired mutation and introducing it to embryonic stem cells; detecting it in the tiny fraction of stem cells that incorporate it; integrating those stem cells into a developing mouse embryo; and then hoping that when the ‘patchwork’ animal matures, its sperm or eggs will carry the mutation, allowing the creation of transgenic offspring.
Source: Feng Zhang/MIT
The approach is feasible only because mouse stem cells are relatively cheap to maintain and screen, and because mice reach sexual maturity within weeks and produce large litters. “You don’t have that luxury with monkeys,” says Edward Callaway, a neuroscientist at the Salk Institute. Marmosets, for example, take 15 months to mature sexually, carry babies for 5 months and often give birth to only 2 young. Macaques take even longer — 3 years to reach sexual maturity, and they typically produce a single baby after a 5.5-month gestation.
Source: Feng Zhang/MIT
Source: Feng Zhang/MIT
“We now have, for the first time, the possibility of trying some of the treatments for genetic-based diseases in primates,” says Robert Desimone, director of the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT.
MIT researchers are now testing CRISPR on fertilized monkey eggs, in collaboration with researchers from the Oregon National Primate Research Center in Beaverton. They will start by disabling genes. MIT neuroscientist Guoping Feng, one of Zhang’s collaborators, wants to disrupt a gene called SHANK3, which has been implicated in some human cases of autism. More sophisticated changes, such as swapping in a different version of a gene, will require more work and engineering, says Zhang.
Eventually, he adds, CRISPR might be used to label specific monkey neuron types or control them with light — just as is currently possible with mouse neurons. Basic neuroscientists are especially keen to see those applications succeed. Anthony Movshon, a monkey-vision researcher at New York University, has watched over the past decade as scientists have used genetic tools to stimulate, inhibit and record neural activity in mice and flies. But for many important areas of neuroscience — cognition, attention, memory and decision-making — those animals are “not that interesting”, he says.
All of this excitement comes at a time when monkey research has become increasingly difficult. In January, following years of pressure by animal-rights activists, United Airlines announced that it would stop transporting research monkeys — eliminating the last North American air carrier available to primate researchers (see Nature 483, 381–382; 2012). And in April, the New England Primate Research Center in Southborough, Massachusetts — one of eight such centers supported by the US National Institutes of Health — announced that it would close after gradually transferring its animals to other facilities.
Despite the controversies, some researchers say that using transgenic monkeys may be the best way to search for treatments for brain diseases and to investigate how networks of neurons create consciousness. “You want to match the model system to the question you’re asking,” says Movshon. “It’s just as unethical to use a mouse for an experiment for which it’s not suited.”
This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on November 6, 2013.
