The Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday proposed new rules meant to help combat climate change by curbing methane emissions from new hydraulically fractured crude oil wells and natural gas pipelines and other infrastructure. The measure, part of the Obama administration’s Climate Action Plan, seeks to cut methane emissions from the oil and gas industry by up to 45 percent below 2012 levels over the next 10 years. Methane is about 35 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a heat-trapping greenhouse gas over the course of a century, and is one of the largest short-term drivers of climate change. The oil and gas industry is responsible for about 29 percent of all the nation’s known methane emissions, according to the EPA. Leaking methane is one of the largest climate change risks associated with utilities switching to natural gas from carbon-laden coal for electric power generation. A study published in 2014 by researchers at Purdue and Cornell universities showed that natural gas drilling could emit up to 1,000 times more methane than previously thought. Tuesday’s proposal applies only to new and modified sources of methane and is expected to cut methane emissions by the equivalent of up to 9 million metric tons of carbon dioxide by 2025. Although recent studies have found large amounts of methane leaking from existing crude oil and natural gas wells, pipelines and fracking operations, EPA acting assistant administrator Janet McCabe said the agency has no immediate plans to regulate methane emissions from existing wells and other sources. In 2012, the EPA required methane emissions to be cut from hydraulically fractured, or fracked, natural gas wells. Tuesday’s rule would require the same of new and modified fracked crude oil wells and natural gas pipelines and other equipment that are connected to natural gas wells. Many wells produce both crude oil and natural gas, and energy companies would be required to find and capture any leaking methane from those wells. “The new EPA rule codifies what the best companies are doing already,” Rob Jackson, an earth system science professor at Stanford University, said. “The new rule highlights the importance of detecting methane leaks quickly and cheaply. It also puts pressure on the EPA to update their methane inventory and emissions factors.” One of the biggest challenges facing both scientists and the EPA is finding and quantifying all of the energy industry’s methane emissions. Scientists, including Jackson, have said that, overall, too little information exists to know how much methane is leaking from oil and gas wells and how to stop it. Part of the problem is that the EPA’s official tally of methane emissions from the oil and gas industry doesn’t include all the industry’s actual emissions because not all of them are counted or reported. For example, recent studies have found large amounts of methane leaking from existing crude oil and natural gas wells, pipelines and fracking operations nationwide, including a large methane plume that was recently discovered, but has existed for many years over oil and gas fields in northwest New Mexico. Terry Engelder, a geosciences professor at Penn State University and vocal supporter of the use of natural gas to replace coal for electric power generation, said most people will likely applaud the EPA’s proposal if it is applied fairly across the country. “The issue is going to be setting a standard for measurement of emissions, and the EPA’s (greenhouse gas) inventory was not uniformly measured in 2012,” he said. “If there was no standard for the measure of emissions back in 2012, it will be difficult to say whether the 45 percent decrease has been reached in 2025.” The EPA’s proposed oil and gas methane rule follows another rule announced last week regulating methane emissions from landfills across the U.S. In addition, the Clean Power Plan, finalized in early August, aims to slash carbon emissions from existing coal-fired power plants 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. The EPA will hold a series of public hearings on Tuesday’s methane rule following a 60-day public comment period before finalizing it. This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on August 18, 2015.
The measure, part of the Obama administration’s Climate Action Plan, seeks to cut methane emissions from the oil and gas industry by up to 45 percent below 2012 levels over the next 10 years.
Methane is about 35 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a heat-trapping greenhouse gas over the course of a century, and is one of the largest short-term drivers of climate change. The oil and gas industry is responsible for about 29 percent of all the nation’s known methane emissions, according to the EPA.
Leaking methane is one of the largest climate change risks associated with utilities switching to natural gas from carbon-laden coal for electric power generation. A study published in 2014 by researchers at Purdue and Cornell universities showed that natural gas drilling could emit up to 1,000 times more methane than previously thought.
Tuesday’s proposal applies only to new and modified sources of methane and is expected to cut methane emissions by the equivalent of up to 9 million metric tons of carbon dioxide by 2025.
Although recent studies have found large amounts of methane leaking from existing crude oil and natural gas wells, pipelines and fracking operations, EPA acting assistant administrator Janet McCabe said the agency has no immediate plans to regulate methane emissions from existing wells and other sources.
In 2012, the EPA required methane emissions to be cut from hydraulically fractured, or fracked, natural gas wells. Tuesday’s rule would require the same of new and modified fracked crude oil wells and natural gas pipelines and other equipment that are connected to natural gas wells.
Many wells produce both crude oil and natural gas, and energy companies would be required to find and capture any leaking methane from those wells.
“The new EPA rule codifies what the best companies are doing already,” Rob Jackson, an earth system science professor at Stanford University, said. “The new rule highlights the importance of detecting methane leaks quickly and cheaply. It also puts pressure on the EPA to update their methane inventory and emissions factors.”
One of the biggest challenges facing both scientists and the EPA is finding and quantifying all of the energy industry’s methane emissions. Scientists, including Jackson, have said that, overall, too little information exists to know how much methane is leaking from oil and gas wells and how to stop it.
Part of the problem is that the EPA’s official tally of methane emissions from the oil and gas industry doesn’t include all the industry’s actual emissions because not all of them are counted or reported.
For example, recent studies have found large amounts of methane leaking from existing crude oil and natural gas wells, pipelines and fracking operations nationwide, including a large methane plume that was recently discovered, but has existed for many years over oil and gas fields in northwest New Mexico.
Terry Engelder, a geosciences professor at Penn State University and vocal supporter of the use of natural gas to replace coal for electric power generation, said most people will likely applaud the EPA’s proposal if it is applied fairly across the country.
“The issue is going to be setting a standard for measurement of emissions, and the EPA’s (greenhouse gas) inventory was not uniformly measured in 2012,” he said. “If there was no standard for the measure of emissions back in 2012, it will be difficult to say whether the 45 percent decrease has been reached in 2025.”
The EPA’s proposed oil and gas methane rule follows another rule announced last week regulating methane emissions from landfills across the U.S. In addition, the Clean Power Plan, finalized in early August, aims to slash carbon emissions from existing coal-fired power plants 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030.
The EPA will hold a series of public hearings on Tuesday’s methane rule following a 60-day public comment period before finalizing it.
This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on August 18, 2015.
